Відео

Не очікував тут побачити земляка, дякую за туторіал)

Rust is a solution looking for a problem. It appeals to people who used dynamic languages before, and want to experience the 'prestige' (giant air quotes) of writing a low-level language. Meanwhile, C++, embedded devs usually don't feel it solves any of their existing problems, but adds a bunch of new ones. I feel like after a couple years of experience, most people don't want to work with the shiny new thing and don't want to agonize over a couple of lines of code, to get it perfect, but just wanna get stuff done.

Seeing the titles of both video and channel I'm going to assume this is yet another apology in favor of Rust, so I'll just dump my personal reasons against touching Rust, after checking it out a year ago. They go from minor inconveniences to the nastiest turn offs: - Built executable sizes seem bigger than they need to be. - The ecosystem is not quite there yet for the language to be ready for serious use. - Coming from more traditional languages, Rust's syntax looks weird to me and its preferred paradigms feel just wrong. Most of the problems it intends to address can be avoided with knowledge built in as much time as it takes to learn Rust to an extent you can use it effectively. - The fact the compiler almost forces you to go with said paradigms for the sake of safety only pisses me off. - Compilation times are way too long. - The community around Rust looks like a cult in my sincere opinion. Elaborating on my last issue, you fans make Rust look like a programming language for activists, and I for one don't care at all about principles or inherent safety or whatever. I'm just looking for language that is either easy to work with, lightweight or fun to use. Rust is cumbersome to understand and use, it's heavyweight af (although at least compiled binaries perform well... if you have the patience to wait for compilation to complete) and it's the boring kind of safe, holding your hands all the time. Like, I could understand a framework being this opinionated about how to do things, but a language? I think I'll pass.

compilers low level programs low level networking code dbs all what we can dev with c

Thank you for this <3

I am new Rust. Thank you for the VSCode Setup, I really needed something like this!

At video location 10.17, Bogdan says in a match statement, an underscore (_) covers all other options in an enum. In my view, this is only partially correct. In the underscore option, we are ignoring the values from the enum. If we use 'other' instead (of underscore), we can use the respective values.

The is how I understand stuff. I kind of have to understand a bit of what is under the hood.

Most of time I am working on multiple project with multiple language. It's very hard to continue with Rust with another languages. Generally we write code, test project and fixed bugs. But Rust compiler don't allow to write code fast. It's complex and ugly syntex language.

Compile-time programming sounded like an interesting keynote. I wonder if it was canceled because the speaker was a noted C++ guy, and there is a definite anti-C++ vibe in some quarters of the Rust community. “Not invented here”, if you will.

5:48 did you just wake up 😅

I really love that. I have a question how do Yew apps perform in the matter of search engines

god bless your soul the best rust tutorial online!

what vscode extensions do you use?

Php has more jobs than rust

What rust needs is another higher level language which would generate current rust code.

Rust looks like what you would see if you looked at c++ code really drunk or high.

I took a look at rust. Come on guys what are you smoking? It looks like c++ haphazardly redesigned by someone high on mushrooms.

6:50 error on assigning the None it looks like this error only for the newer version of rust

I don't think that something deserves to be hated, unless they devs wanted to. Rust is like a school teacher that guides you thru all the way of sys development and make sure that you are not shooting in your leg. It's cool that you need to think differently because of borrowing, and other stuff. But why? It's not even faster than C/C++. So what the point? C++ has deallocation (destructors) and Java/Python and other Runtime languages (VM's) has garbage collectors. Of course Java/Python not fast enough as Rust/C cuz simply garbage collector takes time. But hey. Choose what you like or need, rather what is your religion. (IMHO)

that pricing is VERY good! too good even. I'll definitely try this out

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

May I ask how long it took you to learn through this journey?

I've forgotten more languages than most people learn, and I have to tell you, the learning curve on Rust is really steep. And I used Lisp in the late 90s. I am also old which isnt helping a lot.

Rust is bloated and complex, so its memory safety while not using a GC is not good enough to justify the effort required to write serious software unless the company really have the time and money. other than memory safety(which can be "escaped" with unsafe rust) there are all bunch of bugs that can happen in Rust like all other languages. It's fast and don't have a GC, so what? Swift don't have a GC too. the borrow checker is a nightmare to use, killing productivity, not to mention all the foot guns that comes with it, which can be a show stopper when using the wrong architecture. sorry, it's just over-hyped soy boy trash language, which will be forgotten once a "simpler" memory safe low level language will be adopted. Zig is one candidate.

Rust?! Wots That Then!? 😁 LOL! Social media NEVER fails to amuse me... One day... New languages like Rust... Are the new shit hot!... Then next, they're not! I'm an 8-bit era Dude so I established my software foundations decades ago! Thus new languages are beneath me! Why reinvent the wheel, when C... And C like languages STILL dominate?! Anyway, my major concern is for new developers... They MUST be confused as heck!!! And with CRAZED individuals promoting AI to replace them... I'm even MORE confused about how we are going to develop the systems needed for the future! AI? NOPE!!! AGI maybe... And if... When... That happens... Then it will be interesting to see how Capitalism will work... When Human Beings become redundant! I can't wait!!! 😁

What do you think about mojo?

Good stuff. The chapter in the Rust book needs this sort of example-based explanation as well as comparisons to other languages lol

Hot take: The reason it's hard to write a linked list in safe Rust is because it's really hard to write a fully correct implementation of linked list. Also, does it really matter when there's a standard library linked list?

Rustrover is quite good, just needs performance improvements. I plan to use it more over time

18:43 LOL even their reps dismiss the 'suggestions'

Thank you for this tutorail, tried running loop in different languages rust is way faster than every other languages !

C syntax is simpler than rust!!!🥲 I want rust with more C-like syntax

Love how Rust is supposed to never have runtime errors, but doesn't even check matrix dimensions for multiplications at compile time. Or how you have to write lifetimes which completely defeats the purpose of having scopes 😅😅

Rust has opened up my eyes to the dangers of inner mutibility -- and holding references to other objects in general. I have had to unlearn some seriously bad habits I picked up from languages where this is easy.

RustRover is pretty good and free for non-commercial use. I won't use M$ Code because I don't like spyware.

Great content Bogdan !

What is a Shtring?

Free for 1 YEAR only :)

Hi, can you make series on poem framework of rust? Lack of resource availability is major concern and first obstacle to get started with it. Thanks :)

the way rust is safe, rhe way the compiler generates a horribly weird assembler

the way rust is safe, rhe way the compiler generates a horribly weird assembler

"Rust is more verbose because of static typing" -- but it's also much more verbose as C, C++, C#, or Java, which are also statically typed. 🙂 The extreme verbosity of Rust seems to stem from trying to have it all: performance and safety. C and C++ offer the same performance as Rust, but not the safety. C# and Java are as safe or safer than Rust, but can't reach the same level of performance since they hide some low-level details. I'll have to really dive into Rust some time to get a proper feeling for the language, but I suspect that this coupling of performance and safety is unnecessary for the vast majority of programmers. Only a very small number of programmers (relatively speaking) write code that's critical for people's livelihood. Most code is ultimately just written for entertainment, or optimizing productivity in various fields of business that aren't life-critical.

Yo, I wanna learn Rust, but I only know C, not C++. Everyone in the comments is talking about C++, and it's making me a bit nervous.

JetBrains IDEs are gorgeous and now one of them dedicated to Rust... it'll be a delightful experience 🤩. Congrats to JetBrains!

is this guy ai generated?

Rust rose to dominance in rewrites of shell utilities. When it comes to large systems, it's a mere whimper.

Is it good to be interested in Zig also and should one learn it

If you want to hate some language because of hype, hate Haskell. Haskell fans seem to think that Haskell is practically perfect language because it's so close to pure mathematics. However, when you start to actually use Haskell, you'll quickly hit the problem that Haskell hasn't even decided on storage for strings. They have type String which is in the core of the language but you cannot use it for real because it wastes so much memory (like 64 bytes per character of text). Then you have Text which is not compatible with String and you have to do explicit conversion back and forth every time you want to call some core function but cannot afford 64x memory usage overhead. And Text cannot hold random binary data so you also have multiple implementations of different binary safe string types with different overheads and type signatures. Meanwhile even PHP has a single binary safe string type that supports UNICODE and very minimal RAM overhead.

I would say you *have to use Rust* if you want to write multithreaded code that uses writable shared memory blocks because Rust is the only language that can avoid data races between threads. If you only write single threaded code and Go is fast enough, you should probably use Go. C and C++ allow writing code that runs equally fast with Rust but nobody seems to be careful enough to write bug-free C or C++. For example, see the Linux kernel. Linux kernel developers are probably among the most careful C programmers in the world and still Linux kernel often contains memory safety issues and data races. If you're writing code for systems where performance doesn't matter or data corruption doesn't matter, sure go with whatever language you like the most.